Review Process

With the help of our knowledgeable Editors, Dream Science International Journals uses a double-blind peer review procedure for an efficient evaluation technique. Senior employees who have a thorough understanding of the subject matter are in charge of the journal's content. With the assistance of internal journal editors, several of the portfolio's journals have external Editors-in-Chief.

• Every article is initially evaluated by our editorial staff based on its timeliness, the interest and significance of the subject, the application of the scientific method, the clarity of the presentation (including the level of English), and the relevance to readers.
• If the manuscript is accepted for peer review, members of the worldwide Editorial Board of the journal and/or other experts in the field will evaluate it.
• The editorial staff chooses these candidates based on their qualifications and reputation.
• Reviewers are expected to declare any possible conflicts of interest that would prevent them from giving an objective assessment of an article.
• The peer-review procedure may be single-blinded or double-blinded depending on the journal.
• Peer reviewers fill out a referee report form and give both general and detailed feedback to the author as well as general remarks to the journal's editor-in-chief(s).
• Anonymized constructive criticism that might aid authors in improving their work is passed (even if the paper is not ultimately accepted).
• If necessary, revised papers can be submitted to additional peer review.
• The Editor-in-Chief of the journal has the final say on whether an article should be accepted for publication.
• Our cascade procedure may be used to suggest an alternate journal to evaluate the manuscript if an article is not judged appropriate for publishing in the journal to which it is submitted.
• This review procedure encourages the production of objective, factually correct, and topical material.