This study investigates the Engagement System, a subsystem of Martin and White’s [1] Appraisal framework, within Sun Tzu’s The Art of War, focusing on its linguistic strategies and rhetorical functions. By analyzing 9,000 words from the English translation of this seminal Chinese military text, the research explored how engagement resources contribute to its persuasive and didactic tone. A mixed-method research design revealed the predominant use of monoglossic resources, establishing authoritative statements and emphasizing clarity. Complementing this, selective heteroglossic resources, particularly contractive elements like disclaim and proclaim, served to reject flawed strategies and assert universal principles, reinforcing the text’s instructive tone. Additionally, heteroglossic expansive resources occasionally acknowledge alternative perspectives, reflecting the text’s adaptability to diverse contexts. This balance between definitive and flexible rhetoric supports the dual purpose of The Art of War: as a prescriptive guide for military strategy and a broadly applicable framework for decision-making in non-military fields. The study also identified recurring engagement patterns that align with Systemic Functional Linguistics principles, demonstrating how linguistic choices enhance the text’s relevance and influence [2]. These findings advance our understanding of engagement resources in Chinese classical texts and offer a methodological contribution to the study of translated military discourse.
Research Article | Open Access | Download Full Text
Volume 3 | Issue 2 | Year 2025 | Article Id: LLL-V3I2P102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59232/LLL-V3I2P102
Exploring Engagement Resources in Chinese Military Discourse: A Corpus-Based Study
Resalaiti Abulaiti, Hesham Suleiman Alyousef
| Received | Revised | Accepted | Published |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 Feb 2025 | 08 Mar 2025 | 09 Apr 2025 | 30 Apr 2025 |
Citation
Resalaiti Abulaiti, Hesham Suleiman Alyousef. “Exploring Engagement Resources in Chinese Military Discourse: A Corpus-Based Study.” DS Journal of Language, Linguistics and Literature, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 12-25, 2025.
Abstract
Keywords
Military discourse, Monoglossic and heteroglossic resources, Engagement system, The art of war.
References
[1] J.R. Martin, and P.R.R. White, The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English, Palgrave Macmillan London, 2005.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] Christian Matthiessen, and M.A.K. Halliday, Systemic Functional Grammar: A First Step into the Theory, pp. 1-30, 2009.
[3] RD Sawyer, The Art of War. Sun Tzu, Westview Press (Original work published 544 BC), 1994.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] Mher Sahakyan, Routledge Handbook of Chinese and Eurasian International Relations, 1st ed., Routledge, Newyork, 2025.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] Wei Meng, and Xiaoyin Zhang, “From Sun Tzu's Art of War to Modern Warfare: Innovative Applications of Genetic Algorithms in Military Strategic Modelling,” Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Research in Management and Economics, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 73-92, 2025.
[6] Jie Li, “The Construction of Patriotism in a China Daily Newspaper Article: A Critical Discourse Analysis,” International Journal of Linguistics, vol. 16, no. 3, 2174-232, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] Ralph D. Sawyer, The Seven Military Classics of Ancient China, Basic Books, 2020.
[8] Roger T. Ames, Sun-Tzu: The Art of Warfare: The First English Translation Incorporating the Recently Discovered Yin-ch'ueh-shan Texts, Ballantine Books, USA, 1993.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] Pinfan Zhu, “Well-Received Chinese Rhetorical Strategies as Identified in the Public Speeches and Reports by Chinese Leaders,” Journal of Media and Communication Studies, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 46-53, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] David Sehnal, An Analysis of ‘Full’ Words in Classical Chinese Based on the Book Laozi, pp. 1-42, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://fphil.uniba.sk/fileadmin/fif/katedry_pracoviska/kvas/SOS_abstracts_16.1/sehnal_16_1.pdf
[11] Yan Rui, “The Construction of PLA Image in China’s Official Discourse From the Perspective of Positive Discourse Analysis——Based on Government Work Reports Over the Last 15 Year,” International Relations and Diplomacy, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 111-118, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] Angela Poh, and MingJiang Li, “A China in Transition: The Rhetoric and Substance of Chinese Foreign Policy under Xi Jinping,”Asian Security, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 84-97, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] Bernardo Mariani, China’s Engagement in Conflict and Post-Conflict Settings: The Quest for Stability, PeaceRep: Rethinking Peace & Transition Processes in a Changing Conflict Landscape, The University of Edinburgh, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peacerep.org/publication/chinas-engagement-in-conflict-and-post-conflict-settings-the-quest-for-stability/
[14] Thomas Cleary, The Art of War: Sun Tzu, Shambhala Publications, 2024.
[15] James Robert Martin, and David Rose, Genre Relations: Mapping Culture, Equinox Textbooks and Surveys in Linguistics, 2008.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[16] James Paul Gee, How to do Discourse Analysis: A Toolkit, Routledge, London, 2010.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[17] Ken Hyland, “Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse,” Discourse Studies, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 173-192, 2005.