DS Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics (DS-AIR)

Research Article | Open Access | Download Full Text

Volume 1 | Issue 2 | Year 2023 | Article Id: AIR-V1I2P101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59232/AIR-V1I2P101

Essence as Algorithm: Public Perceptions of AI-Powered Avatars of Real People

James Hutson, Jeremiah Ratican, Colleen Biri

ReceivedRevisedAcceptedPublished
30 Jun 202318 Aug 202311 Sep 202311 Oct 2023

Citation

James Hutson, Jeremiah Ratican, Colleen Biri. “Essence as Algorithm: Public Perceptions of AI-Powered Avatars of Real People.” DS Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1-14, 2023.

Abstract

This paper investigates the intersection of generative AI, Large Language Models (LLM), and robotics. Exemplified by systems like ChatGPT and technological marvels such as Ameca the Robot, the combination of technologies will allow humans to transcend the limitations of death. Through digital necromancy, a practice encompassing the technological resurrection of deceased individuals, the ability to not only passively see recordings of loved ones but to interact with them is made possible, leading to ethical and psychological considerations. Therefore, examining these trends extends into the motives underlying engagement with both incorporeal and corporeal reproductions of individuals, with reasons ranging from memory conservation to the attainment of emotional closure. In order to further research in this area, results from a survey are presented, offering a detailed portrayal of prevailing societal perspectives on AI-powered avatars. These insights shed light on the multifaceted interplay between technology and human emotion, the market dynamics propelling this emerging field, and the anticipatory understanding necessary to confront future ethical and functional challenges. The research contributes significantly to the ongoing discourse on the role of AI in society, underscoring the necessity of a balanced approach to innovation and ethics in the domain of AI-driven human representation as integration into society becomes standardized.

Keywords

Digital necromancy, Generative AI, Large Language Models (LLM), Ethical considerations, Grieving process.

References

[1] Tal Morse, “Digital Necromancy: Users’ Perceptions of Digital Afterlife and Posthumous Communication Technologies,” Information, Communication & Society, 2023.

[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[2] Suzie Dunn, “Identity Manipulation: Responding to Advances in Artificial Intelligence and Robotics,” WeRobot, Conference Paper, pp. 1-43, 2020.

[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[3] Andrea Sestino, and Alfredo D'Angelo, “My Doctor is an Avatar! The Effect of Anthropomorphism and Emotional Receptivity on Individuals' Intention to Use Digital-Based Healthcare Services,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 191, 2023.

[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[4] Anna Xygkou et al., “The "Conversation" about Loss: Understanding How Chatbot Technology was Used in Supporting People in Grief,” Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, no. 646, pp. 1-15, 2023.

[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[5] José María Rodanés-Vicente et al., “Use of Cinnabar in Funerary Practices in the Central Pyrenees. Analysis of Pigments on Bones from the Prehistoric Burial of the Cueva de la Sierra Cave in Campodarbe (Huesca, Spain),” Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, vol. 48, 2023.

[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[6] Gagandeep Kaur, and Prashant Chauhan, “Cybersecurity Vis-A-Vis Artificial Intelligence: An Analysis of the International Conventions,” Emerging Technologies in Data Mining and Information Security, vol. 490, pp. 357-365, 2022.

[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[7] Shamayleh Ghalia, and Zeynep Arsel, From Blogs to Platforms, The Routledge Handbook of Digital Consumption, 2022.

[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[8] Xie Tianling, and Pentina Iryna, “Attachment Theory as a Framework to Understand Relationships with Social Chatbots: A Case Study of Replika,” Presented at the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2022.

[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[9] Iffat Ali Aksar, Amira Firdaus, and Saadia Anwar Pasha, “Virtual vs. Real Self: Gendered Presentation and Everyday Performance of Virtual Selfhood–A Case Study of Pakistan,” Journal of Communication Inquiry, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 84-114, 2022.

[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[10] Nora Freya Lindemann, “The Ethical Permissibility of Chatting with the Dead: Towards a Normative Framework for ‘Deathbots’,” Publications of the Institute of Cognitive Science, 2022.

[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[11] Jana M. Moser, “Tupac Lives! What Hologram Authors Should Know about Intellectual Property Law,” Business Law Today, pp. 1-5, 2012.

[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[12] Rogue One, Rogue one: A Star Wars story, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.how.com.vn/wiki/de/Rogue_One

[13] Aras Alkis, and Tekin Kose, “Privacy Concerns in Consumer E-Commerce Activities and Response to Social Media Advertising: Empirical Evidence from Europe,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 137, 2022.

[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[14] Shahid Mehmood et al., “Sentiment Analysis in Social Media for Competitive Environment Using Content Analysis,” Computers, Materials & Continua, vol. 71, no. 3, 2022.

[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[15] Antonio S. Williams, Zack P. Pedersen, and Kelly J. Brummett, “Legacy Branding: The Posthumous Utilization and Management of Athlete Brands,” International Journal of Sport Communication, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 85-92, 2022.

[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[16] Frederick Mostert, and Sheyna Cruz, “How Image Rights Have Changed over the Past 20 Years,” Developments and Directions in Intellectual Property Law: The IPKat’s 20-Year Adventure, Forthcoming, 2022.

[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[17] Ivor Berkowitz, and Jeremy R. Garrett, “Legal and Ethical Considerations for Requiring Consent for Apnea Testing in Brain Death Determination,” The American Journal of Bioethics, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 4-16, 2020.

[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[18] Pei Wang, “On Defining Artificial Intelligence,” Journal of Artificial General Intelligence, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1-37, 2019.

[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[19] Marvin Minsky, The Emotion Machine: Commonsense Thinking, Artificial Intelligence, and The Future of The Human Mind, Simon and Schuster, 2007.

[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[20] Davide Sisto, and Alice Kilgarriff, Remember Me: Memory and Forgetting in the Digital Age, John Wiley & Sons, 2021.

[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[21] Theresa Payton, and Ted Claypoole, Privacy in the Age of Big Data: Recognizing Threats, Defending your Rights, and Protecting your Family, Rowman & Littlefield, 2023.

[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[22] Anna Baglione et al., “Mobile Technologies for Grief Support: Prototyping An Application to Support the Bereaved,” Workshop on Interactive Systems in Health Care, 2017.

[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[23] Michael Massimi, “Thanatosensitively Designed Technologies for Bereavement Support,” CHI'10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2951-2954, 2010. 

[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[24] Anastasia S. Mihailidou et al., “Impact of Grief Delivered via Media Technology,” The Medical Journal of Australia, vol. 203, no. 4, 2015.

[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[25] Elisabeth Beaunoyer et al., “Grieving in the Digital Era: Mapping Online Support for Grief and Bereavement,” Patient Education and Counseling, vol. 103, no. 12, pp. 2515-2524, 2020.

[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[26] Birgit Wagner, and Andreas Maercker, “A 1.5‐year Follow‐Up of an Internet‐Based Intervention for Complicated Grief,” Journal of Traumatic Stress, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 625-629, 2007.

[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[27] C. Botella et al., “Treatment of Complicated Grief Using Virtual Reality: A Case Report,” Death Studies, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 674-692, 2008. 

[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[28] Silvia Francesca Maria Pizzoli et al., “From Virtual to Real Healing: A Critical Overview of the Therapeutic Use of Virtual Reality to Cope with Mourning,” Current Psychology, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 8697-8704, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[29] Lisa M. Moyer, and Suzanne Enck, “Is My Grief Too Public for You? The Digitalization of Grief on Facebook™,” Death Studies, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 89-97, 2020.

[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[30] Bjorn Nansen et al., “Social Media in the Funeral Industry: On the Digitization of Grief,” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 73-89, 2017.

[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[31] Darius Pacauskas et al., “Harnessing User Innovation for Social Media Marketing: Case Study of a Crowdsourced Hamburger,” International Journal of Information Management, vol. 43, pp. 319-327, 2018.

[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[32] Michael Massimi, and Ronald M. Baecker, “A Death in the Family: Opportunities for Designing Technologies for the Bereaved,” Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1821-1830, 2010.

[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[33] Wendy Moncur et al., “From Death to Final Disposition: Roles of Technology in the Post-Mortem Interval,” Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 531-540, 2012.

[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[34] Jianning Dang, and Li Liu, “Robots are Friends as Well as Foes: Ambivalent Attitudes toward Mindful and Mindless AI Robots in the United States and China,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 115, 2021. 

[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[35] Jeffrey C. Alexander, What Makes a Social Crisis?: The Societalization of Social Problems, John Wiley & Sons, 2019.

[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[36] Donghee Shin, “The Effects of Explainability and Causability on Perception, Trust, and Acceptance: Implications for Explainable AI,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 146, 2021.

[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[37] Luye Bao et al., “Whose AI? How Different Publics Think about AI and its Social Impacts,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 130, 2022.

[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

Essence as Algorithm: Public Perceptions of AI-Powered Avatars of Real People